Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 5(1): e13105, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38405371

RESUMO

Objectives: For adults with a complaint of diarrhea presenting to United States emergency departments (EDs) from 2016 to 2021, we examined the: (1) occurrence and temporal trends in these ED visits, (2) frequency with which services were provided (laboratory testing, radiologic imaging, and intravenous fluids (IV fluids) administration) and patients were admitted; and (3) factors associated with service provision and admission. Methods: Data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2016-2021) were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was employed to examine factors associated with service provision and admission, according to patient demographic characteristics, healthcare insurance status, and associated clinical symptoms; ED geographic location; and type of ED medical staff who evaluated the patient. Results: From 2016 to 2017, there were 3.3-3.7 million ED visits/year by adults with a complaint of diarrhea (3.1% [95% CI 2.9-3.3] of all adult US ED visits). Services were provided and patients were admitted per these frequencies: complete blood count (80%; 95% CI 76-83); blood culture (8%; 95% CI 6-9); metabolic panel (94%; 95% CI 86-97); ultrasound (8%; 95% CI 7-10); abdominal/pelvic CT (33%; 95% CI 29-35); IV fluids (63%; 95% CI 50-66); and admission (16%; 95% CI 14-18). Factors associated with receipt of these services and admission included other presenting symptoms (abdominal pain, vomiting, and nausea), ED geographic location, ED medical staff member evaluating the patient, race, Hispanic ethnicity, and type of health insurance. Conclusion: For adult patients presenting to US EDs with a complaint of diarrhea, US EDs highly utilized selected laboratory tests and radiologic imaging. Differences in utilization raise concerns about equitable healthcare delivery and call for further investigation into the underlying reasons, as well as the development and adoption of standardized care pathways.

2.
Egypt Heart J ; 70(4): 361-364, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30591755

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Catheter related blood stream infection (CRBSI) is the main complication of central venous catheter (CVC) use. The aim of the study is to improve the safety of patients with central venous catheter in National Heart Institute (NHI) medical cardiac care units. METHODS: A Prospective cohort study was conducted on one hundred and eleven cardiac patients in (NHI) cardiac care units from August 2017 to February 2018. All patients subjected to central venous catheter (CVC) in cardiac care units, NHI, were included except: 1. Patients with obvious source of infection, 2. Immunocompromised patients, 3. patients having infective endocarditis, 4. patients whose catheter was put outside NHI. RESULTS: Noncompliance of health care providers to care bundle elements of CVC of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) represents a risk factor for CRBSI occurrence. Coagulase negative staphylococci was the most common isolated organism. CONCLUSION: Health care providers should adhere care bundle elements recommended by CDC during insertion and handling of CVC. This will in turn decrease CRBSI.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...